Grok 4.3 vs Grok 4.7: which is better in QueryWise?

The quality gap is clear

Grok 4.3 currently scores 5.5 in QueryWise and ranks 29. Grok 4.7 scores 8.3 and sits in 12 place. So the overall verdict is straightforward: Grok 4.7 leads on the current score.

The difference is most noticeable on tasks that require several steps of reasoning. Grok 4.3 has a reasoning score of 9.2. If you need to review a 200-page contract, compare terms, or find a contradiction in a long exchange, Grok 4.7 is the sensible first choice because of its higher overall score.

That said, Grok 4.3 should not be dismissed. Its coding score is 6.1, and it may be more convenient for short technical requests that do not need a long plan: explaining a Python error, rewriting a regular expression, or checking an SQL query.

For context, the models currently near the top of the ranking include Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Muse Spark 1.3. Grok 4.7 is part of that top four, while Grok 4.3 is noticeably lower. This does not mean 4.3 performs poorly on every question. It simply means that 4.7 has more quality headroom on difficult prompts.

Speed and price: no need to pay more

The models are practically identical in price: an average question in QueryWise costs about 10 ₸ with Grok 4.3 and about 10 ₸ with Grok 4.7. So the decision does not come down to the tariff. At the same price, it makes sense to choose the model with the higher current score when the question is important or lengthy.

There is not yet enough data on median response speed for a fair comparison. QueryWise currently lists — for Grok 4.3 and — for Grok 4.7. We do not present assumptions as measurements, so there is no speed winner for now.

For users in Kazakhstan, the terms are the same. Both models are available in QueryWise, payments are processed in tenge, and the interface is available in Russian and Kazakh. New users receive three free questions at the start. This is a convenient way to test both models on the same material before adding funds.

More context versus more precise selection

Grok 4.3 works with a context of 1M, while Grok 4.7 has a window of 500K. On paper, 4.3 offers more room for source material. That helps when you need to load a long message archive, several technical specifications, or a substantial project document.

But a larger context window does not guarantee a good answer by itself. The model still has to find the relevant passage, retain a condition from the middle of the file, and connect it to the conclusion. So 4.3 may be more practical for a long document because of its larger context, while Grok 4.7 is preferable for complex analysis within the available window.

We tested the models with real questions. For the prompt “compare two Kazakhstani supply contracts, find discrepancies in payment deadlines, and list the risks for the buyer,” Grok 4.3 usefully breaks the terms into points but may mix up sections when the input is long. Grok 4.7 holds the overall logic of the task more confidently, although its legal conclusions still need to be checked. This is not legal advice.

In another scenario — “fix this JavaScript function and explain why it returns duplicates” — Grok 4.3 is well suited to quickly reviewing a small code fragment. For a learning prompt such as “explain Bayes’ theorem using credit scoring in Kazakhstan, then give three problems with solutions,” Grok 4.7 looks more convincing when consistency and verifiability matter.

Choose based on the situation

Choose Grok 4.7 when you need one primary assistant for complex analysis, learning, or coding, while keeping the price roughly the same. Grok 4.7 is already ahead on the current score, and that advantage does not come from a more expensive query.

Grok 4.3 makes sense for very large inputs and short technical tasks. Its 1M context may outweigh the ranking difference when you need to keep a large body of text in the prompt. For critical decisions, however, its answer should be checked against primary sources.

In QueryWise, you can send the same question to both models and see where they agree and where they differ. This mode is especially useful before submitting a report or reviewing a contract. But if you need a single answer without an additional run, our choice based on the current data is Grok 4.7.